| Pages: [1] |
1. Concord and Insurance. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sporked (...) It's simply not feasible to suicide gank hi-sec (remember, it's HIGH security not TOTAL security) targets without insurance payouts while we still have an omnipotent police force that it is against the game rul...
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.22 19:08:00
|
2. Ganking + insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Culmen For all the proof you need that CONCORD Kills should be insured. See: first day incursions entered high sec. Lots of CONCORD related deaths, not that much more suicide ganking. Love how short the forum's memory is......
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.22 18:29:00
|
3. Concord and Insurance. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Space Tarantula Haklar on 22/02/2011 13:58:24 Originally by: Tippia (...) Sure, if the victims don't mind, then the opposition and conflict is gone and it becomes more of a very rowdy barbecue, but considering all the whini...
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.22 13:55:00
|
4. Concord and Insurance. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia (...)In other words, it enables combat. u mad? Combat? What combat? We don't want combat! We want easy targets for no work! It's not like Eve was supposed to be a cold harsh world
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.22 06:28:00
|
5. Ganking + insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia (...)it wouldn't serve its actual purpose: to reward people who blow up/get blown up a lot. Building on wrong assumptions can only draw poor conclusions... The insurance has no other purpose than help newer pla...
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.21 18:53:00
|
6. Ganking + insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Space Tarantula Haklar Originally by: Malcanis (...) it's hardly reasnoable to complain that gankers "take no risk" and "have it easy". If they have it easy purely because their target...
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.17 19:27:00
|
7. Ganking + insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Long John Silver as in RL. as in RL. The two main flaws in your argument. Sure! It's not like every Eve player and his dog is proud to claim that he is playing a game which ec...
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.17 12:50:00
|
8. Ganking + insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis (...) it's hardly reasnoable to complain that gankers "take no risk" and "have it easy". If they have it easy purely because their targets do everything possible to make it easy. (...) OK, the point is somewha...
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.17 09:31:00
|
9. Ganking + insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Othran I have to be honest about this and say you shouldn't get any insurance if concord pop you. I've been in various pirate corps over the years (from space invaders onwards) and its bullsh...
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.16 19:22:00
|
10. Ganking + insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's call game balance: risks and looses are only meant to be sustained by carebears. The day as*holes are put into orbit, you don't finish spinning M. Audiard
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.16 14:19:00
|
11. Alts being used to Exploit and Spoil Fairness. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Milky Wimpshake (...) 3) Make scanning ships a hostile act. Would take care of the alt ship scanners, but can't say I'm really a big fan of this idea. (...) Hmmm... I like that one : How would you consider an unknown guy...
- by Space Tarantula Haklar - at 2011.02.16 13:37:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |